Abstract

The degree to which recipient/donor (R/D) size mismatching leads to nephron underdosing and worse kidney allograft survival remains poorly defined, particularly in the setting of preexisting nephron loss such as the expanded criteria donor (ECD). We performed a retrospective analysis of 69,737 deceased donor transplants followed by a subset analysis of ECD transplants using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1992 to 2005. Ratios of R/D body surface area (BSA) were used to estimate nephron disparity and segregate pairs. In the entire cohort, severe BSA disparity (R/D BSA>1.38 m) was associated with slightly worse 10-year unadjusted graft survival (35% for severe BSA disparity vs. 39% in pairs of comparable size, P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, BSA disparity was associated with a 15% increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio 1.15, P<0.0001). Within ECD cohorts, severe BSA disparity was associated with a decrease in 10-year unadjusted graft survival of greater magnitude than the overall cohort (10% for severe BSA disparity vs. 22% in pairs of comparable size, P<0.0004). On multivariate analysis, severe R/D BSA disparity was associated with worse allograft survival similar to the entire cohort (hazard ratio 1.18, P=0.04). Recipients receiving kidneys from substantially smaller donors have a statistically higher rate of graft loss that is more pronounced in ECD kidneys. Although severe R/D size disparity is an independent risk factor for graft loss, the magnitude of this risk requires consideration in the context of other risk factors for the graft loss and the hazards of dialysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.