Long-term efficacy and safety of ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Abstract

Abstract Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often accompanied by atrial fibrillation (AF) but data on safety and long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for AF in HCM are scarce. Purpose To investigate safety, long-term efficacy and clinical outcomes following AF ablation in patients with HCM and in matched controls. Methods Patients with HCM (n=76) undergoing a first catheter ablation for AF or atrial flutter between 1999 and 2022 at a University Hospital in Sweden were included (age 64±12 years, 43% female). Diagnosis of HCM was based on the European Society of Cardiology definition (left ventricular wall thickness ≥15 mm or ≥13 mm not solely explained by abnormal loading conditions, and combined with family history, genetic components and/or electrocardiogram abnormalities). Patients with HCM were matched with controls (n=152) based on age, gender, ablation type and intervention-year. Patients were followed for a mean of 5 years and study endpoints included heart failure hospitalization (HFH), stroke and mortality. Cox regression analyses were performed for the association between HCM and the endpoints. Results Among the overall population, 121 (53%) underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), 62 (27%) isthmus ablation and 45 (20%) His-Bundle ablation. Patients with HCM had a shorter mean duration of AF before ablation (48 months vs. 66 months; p=0.047) and more severe symptoms as indicated by a higher EHRA class (EHRA class IV: 30% vs. 10%; p<0.01). Procedural success rate of PVI and isthmus ablation was lower in patients with versus without HCM (88% vs. 97%; p=0.02). Procedure related complications (vascular complications, tamponade) were overall similar in both groups (9% in HCM vs. 5% in controls, p=0.17) except for higher rates of pulmonary oedema in patients with HCM (7% vs 1%, p=0.03). There was a nearly two-fold increase in risk of AF recurrence after PVI or isthmus ablation in patients with HCM compared to controls (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.06-3.58; p=0.03). During follow-up, patients with HCM had an increased risk of HFH (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.21-5.36, p=0.01) but not of stroke or mortality (Figure 1). Conclusion AF ablation was overall safe in patients with HCM but less effective. Patients with HCM had an increased risk of the individual endpoint of HFH after AF ablation but not stroke or mortality during long-term follow-up.