Abstract
Fire is an important disturbance agent in Chinese boreal forests but the long-term effects of wildfires on soil nitrogen (N) net mineralisation rates (Rmin) in natural versus human-assisted restorations are not well understood. In this study, we analysed upper (0–10cm) and lower layer (10–20cm) soil samples from natural restoration and afforestation plots in a Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii) forest in north-eastern China 29years after a mega fire disturbance. Our results showed that the soil inorganic N (NH4+-N and NO3−-N) pool of the upper and lower layers of the regenerated plots remained significantly lower than in unburned control plots. This suggests that the effects of a high burn severity fire on soil N availability were still significant almost 30years after the event. Restoration type (natural restoration versus afforestation) also had significant effects on upper layer soil N availability; compared with afforestation, natural restoration was more beneficial for the accumulation of soil inorganic N and the recovery of Rmin after fire disturbance. Specifically, the concentration of inorganic N and the mean Rmin in upper layer soils in the natural restoration plots were approximately 41% greater and 3.6 times greater, respectively, than in the afforestation plots. The differences in soil N availability between the two restoration types were attributed to differences in soil water content (SWC), soil microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and the recovery of vegetation after the fire disturbance. Our study demonstrates that natural restoration has proved more successful than afforestation in countering soil N losses in boreal forests in China resulting from a high burn severity fire disturbance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.