Abstract
Purpose: The long-term effectiveness and efficiency of an outpatient geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) program was compared to usual primary care (UPC). Design and Method: A randomized controlled group design was used. Health care utilization, cost of care, and survival were assessed during a 48-month period among a sample of 160 male veterans age 55 and over who were above-average users of outpatient services. Results: The results indicate that GEM patients incurred significantly lower overall health care costs than UPC patients by 24 months and that cost savings plateaued during the 24- to 48-month period. Cost savings were due primarily to fewer hospital days of care. No significant differences were found in survival. Implications: Results of this follow-up study suggest that outpatient GEMoffers a specialized health delivery option for frail older persons that may reduce costs over the long term without having a negative impact on survival rates.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
