Abstract

The reduction of stress reactivity resulting from stress management interventions prevents disorders and improves mental health, however, its long-term sustainability has been little examined. The objective of this study was, therefore, to determine the effectiveness of a stress management intervention, designed to improve stress reactivity, for mental health and sleep problems seven years later, using longitudinal data from 101 male industrial workers. Linear regressions estimated the adjusted effects of the changes in stress reactivity in general as well as in its six subdimensions (work overload, social conflict, social stress, failure at work, and anticipatory and prolonged reactivity) on depression, anxiety, and sleep problems seven years later. The improvement of the prolonged reactivity had positive effects on depression, anxiety, and sleep problems (unstandardized regression coefficients [Bs] ≥ 0.35, all p-values ≤ 0.01). Depression and sleep problems were further improved by a reduction of the reactivity to social conflicts (Bs ≥ 0.29, p-values < 0.05), and an improvement in the overall reactivity score positively influenced sleep problems (B = 0.07, p = 0.017). In conclusion, the improvement of stress reactivity resulting from a work stress intervention was effective and generally long-lasting in preventing mental health and sleep problems. The reduction of the prolonged reactivity seems of particular importance and efficient in inhibiting negative stress manifestations.

Highlights

  • Ample evidence indicates chronic stress as a risk factor for physical and mental health [1]

  • The stress management intervention seminars were almost evenly distributed in the years 2006 and 2007

  • The improvement in the overall stress reactivity score, as well as in the work overload, the social conflicts, and the prolonged reactivity subdimensions positively affected sleep quality seven years later (Model 4: Boverall score = 0.07; p = 0.017; R2 = 17%; Bsocial conflicts = 0.29; p = 0.005; R2 = 18%; Bprolonged reactivity = 0.35; p = 0.010; R2 = 17%; Table 5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ample evidence indicates chronic stress as a risk factor for physical and mental health [1]. It is for example known that chronic stress at work manifests in poor mental health, such as depression and anxiety [2,3], as well as in in sleep problems [4]. Individual differences in the reactions to stress ( referred to as stress reactivity) are seen to be critical in understanding the stress effects on health, since they can influence an individual’s susceptibility to develop chronic diseases [5]. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 255; doi:10.3390/ijerph15020255 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call