Abstract
Abstract The advantage of symplectic integrators compared with non-symplectic Runge-Kutta integrators is shown in the computation of adiabatic invariants. Symplectic integrators do not produce a secular growth of the error, contrary to non-symplectic Runge-Kutta integrators. Furthermore, we compared the performance of 2nd, 4th, and 6th order symplectic integrators and obtained the numerical results that show SI6 has the best performance when the numerical error in the adiabatic invariants must be below 0.03%. The model systems that we used are a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator with a slowly varying frequency and a one-particle system in a slowly varying isochrone potential.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
