Abstract
To assess hard major adverse clinical events (HMACE) after successful versus failed percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (PCI-CTO). There are limited data regarding long-term HMACE risks based on PCI-CTO success. First-time PCI was performed in 438 consecutive patients with 473 target CTO lesions. Patients after procedural success (n=355; 378 CTO lesions) and failure (n=83; 95 CTO lesions) were followed for an average 40months (7-77months range). We compared HMACE (composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke) dependent on the success of PCI. The incidence of HMACE was low, with a total of 16 events, and did not differ {6% vs.3.1%, HR=0.47; CI [0.16-1.35; p=0.162} dependent on the success of PCI-CTO. There were less cardiac deaths {0.3% vs. 1.2%, RR=0.22; CI [0.01-3.50];p=0.283}, non fatal MI {1.1% vs.3.6%, RR=0.27; CI [0.06-1.22], p=0.089}, but more strokes {1.7% vs.1.2%, RR=1.32; CI [0.16-10.99], p=0.795} after successful PCI-CTO. The risks of HMACE after PCI-CTO over long-term follow-up were minimal, and do not depend on the procedure success. This unexpected finding somewhat challenge the aggressive interventional approach, and should be confirmed in the adequately powered randomized trial.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.