Abstract

The number of patients treated with the mechanical circulatory support device Impella Cardiac Power (CP) for cardiogenic shock is steadily increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term survival and complications related to this modality. Patients undergoing Impella CP treatment for cardiogenic shock were retrospectively enrolled and matched with cardiogenic shock patients not treated with mechanical circulatory support between 2010 and 2020. Data were collected from the cardiogenic shock registry of the university hospital of Munich (DRKS00015860). 70 patients with refractory cardiogenic shock without mechanical circulatory support were matched with 70 patients treated with Impella CP. At presentation, the mean age was 67 ± 15 years with 80% being male in the group without support and 67 ± 14 years (p = 0.97) with 76% being male (p = 0.68) in the group with Impella. There was no significant difference in the rate of cardiac arrest (47% vs. 51%, p = 0.73) and myocardial infarction was the predominant cause of cardiogenic shock in both groups (70% vs. 77%). A total of 41% of patients without cardiocirculatory support and 54% of patients with Impella support died during the first month (p = 0.17). After one year, mortality rates were similar in both groups (55% in conventional vs. 59% in Impella CP group, p = 0.30) as was mortality rate at long-term 5-years follow-up (64% in conventional vs. 73% in Impella CP group, p = 0.33). The rate of clinically significant bleedings during ICU stay was lower in the conventional group than in the Impella support group (15% vs. 43%, p = 0.002). In this small observational and non-randomized analysis no difference in long-term outcome between patients treated with Impella CP vs. guideline directed cardiogenic shock therapy without mechanical circulatory support could be detected. Care must be taken regarding the high rate of bleeding and vascular complications when using Impella CP. Large, adequately powered studies are urgently needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Impella CP in cardiogenic shock.

Highlights

  • Cardiogenic shock is still the major driver of mortality in cardiac intensive care units (ICU) and complicates around 10% of myocardial infarctions with contemporary 30-day and 1-year mortality up to 52% and 57% according to the latest large scale randomized trials (IABP II [1,2], CULPRIT-SHOCK trial [3, 4])

  • There is only one small prospective randomized trial, the IMPRESS-IN-SEVERE-SHOCK trial which compared efficacy and safety of the Impella Cardiac Power (CP) vs. intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) and did not show any survival benefit in the 48 patients included [13]

  • Numerous retrospective trials investigated acute and few mid-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock patients treated with Impella with maximum follow-up of 1 year [14] with 30-day mortality rates ranging from 36–52% [14,15,16,17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiogenic shock is still the major driver of mortality in cardiac intensive care units (ICU) and complicates around 10% of myocardial infarctions with contemporary 30-day and 1-year mortality up to 52% and 57% according to the latest large scale randomized trials (IABP II [1,2], CULPRIT-SHOCK trial [3, 4]). There is only one small prospective randomized trial, the IMPRESS-IN-SEVERE-SHOCK trial which compared efficacy and safety of the Impella CP vs intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) and did not show any survival benefit in the 48 patients included [13]. Numerous retrospective trials investigated acute and few mid-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock patients treated with Impella with maximum follow-up of 1 year [14] with 30-day mortality rates ranging from 36–52% [14,15,16,17]. Studies were mixing different types of Impella, namely Impella 2.5, CP and 5.0 [18,19,20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call