Long-term clinical follow-up of microfracture versus mosaicplasty in articular cartilage defects of medial femoral condyle

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome after cartilage repair surgery in focal defects of the knee by microfracture versus mosaicplasty. MethodsA cohort of 102 patients undergoing microfracture (n=52) or mosaicplasty (n=50) of a single articular cartilage defect in the medial femoral condyle of ≤50mm2 was evaluated by Lysholm score before surgery, at six months, 12months, five years, 10years, and 15–18years after surgery. ResultsMedian age of patients at the time of surgery was 36years (range 16–58) and median follow-up time was 16years (range 14–18). Defects were treated with a median size of three square centimetres (range one to five). A significant increase was seen in the Lysholm score from mean 48 (SD 16) at baseline to 66 (SD 23; P<0.001) at the 15–18year follow-up. The Lysholm score was higher in the mosaicplasty group at six months, 12months, five years and 10years (P<0.05 for all comparisons). These differences were clinically significant at all points (>10 points). However, at the final follow-up, the difference (eight points) did not reach statistical significance. ConclusionsIn the short-term, medium-term and long-term (10years), mosaicplasty in a single cartilage defect size one to five square centimetres of the femoral condyle resulted in clinically relevant better outcome than microfracture. However, at 15–18years after the surgery such a difference could not be found. In the six month to 10–15year (after surgery) perspective, the mosaicplasty procedure offered a better outcome in this type of lesion. Level of evidenceLevel III.