Abstract

Simple SummaryThe induction of an effective immune response against tumor cells is of a great benefit in the battle against cancers. We recently characterized a novel, safe, and cost-effective strategy to induce an efficient CD8+ T cell immune response against potentially whatever antigen. This technique is based on in vivo engineering of exosomes/extracellular vesicles (EVs), i.e., nanovesicles constitutively released by all healthy cells. Immunogenic EVs are generated by intramuscular injection of a DNA vector expressing an EV-anchoring protein fused with the antigen of interest. In this paper, we applied our vaccine platform to counteract the growth of tumors expressing antigens of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). We demonstrated that this method is instrumental in curing mice already developing HPV-related tumors. In addition, cured mice were shown to resist a second tumor cell implantation. These results could be of relevance for a possible translation into the clinic of our technology.We developed an innovative method to induce antigen-specific CD8+ T cytotoxic lymphocyte (CTL) immunity based on in vivo engineering of extracellular vesicles (EVs). This approach employs a DNA vector expressing a mutated HIV-1 Nef protein (Nefmut) deprived of the anti-cellular effects typical of the wild-type isoform, meanwhile showing an unusual efficiency of incorporation into EVs. This function persists even when foreign antigens are fused to its C-terminus. In this way, Nefmut traffics large amounts of antigens fused to it into EVs spontaneously released by the recipient cells. We previously provided evidence that mice injected with a DNA vector expressing the Nefmut/HPV16-E7 fusion protein developed an E7-specific CTL immune response as detected 2 weeks after the second immunization. Here, we extended and optimized the anti-HPV16 CD8+ T cell immune response induced by the endogenously engineered EVs, and evaluated the therapeutic antitumor efficacy over time. We found that the co-injection of DNA vectors expressing Nefmut fused with E6 and E7 generated a stronger anti-HPV16 immune response compared to that observed in mice injected with the single vectors. When HPV16-E6 and -E7 co-expressing tumor cells were implanted before immunization, all mice survived at day 44, whereas no mice injected with either void or Nefmut-expressing vectors survived until day 32 after tumor implantation. A substantial part of immunized mice (7 out of 12) cleared the tumor. When the cured mice were re-challenged with a second tumor cell implantation, none of them developed tumors. Both E6- and E7-specific CD8+ T immunities were still detectable at the end of the observation time. We concluded that the immunity elicited by engineered EVs, besides counteracting and curing already developed tumors, was strong enough to guarantee the resistance to additional tumor attacks. These results can be of relevance for the therapy of both metastatic and relapsing tumors.

Highlights

  • Eukaryotic cells spontaneously release vesicles of different sizes including apoptotic bodies (1–5 μm), microvesicles (50–1000 nm), and exosomes (50–200 nm) [1]

  • The intramuscular (i.m.) injection of DNA vectors expressing a plethora of both tumor and viral antigens fused to Nefmut was shown to induce antigen-specific CD8+ T

  • In the intent to optimize the immune response induced by engineered extracellular vesicles (EVs), we evaluated the impact of electroporation (EP) procedures applied soon after DNA injections

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eukaryotic cells spontaneously release vesicles of different sizes including apoptotic bodies (1–5 μm), microvesicles (50–1000 nm), and exosomes (50–200 nm) [1]. Healthy cells constitutively release both exosomes and microvesicles, together referred to as extracellular vesicles (EVs). They are a relevant means of intercellular delivery of macromolecules, such as DNAs, RNAs, proteins, and lipids [2,3]. EVs are abundant, stable, and highly bioavailable to tissues. They find potential applications as diagnostic biomarkers, therapeutics, drug delivery vehicles, and functional cosmetics. Clinical trials did not confirm the therapeutic efficacy of in vitro/ex vivo engineered EVs, mostly because of a number of drawbacks associated with functional reproducibility and loading of specific cargoes [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call