Abstract
Objective : to compare long-term results of total hip replacement according to approach and type of fi xation (cemented, uncemented). Materials and methods: the outcomes of 39 total hip replacement were estimated for the fi rst time aft er 5-6 years and for the second time aft er 11-15 years aft er the treatment. they have been compared by Bartel, Harris and WOMAC scores. Results : Kaplan-Meyer and descriptive statistics applied to get validated results. Conclusions: received data demonstrated durable positive functional results while Keggy’s approach has been used. Cemented fi xation and hybrid prostheses have longer survival rate than cementless devices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
