Abstract

Simple SummaryPrey species must fine-tune their antipredator responses to survive, but also to achieve a positive net energy balance which will enhance biological fitness. Given this, we investigated if Oligoryzomys longicaudatus would adapt their behavioural and physiological antipredator responses depending on their relative presence in the predator’s diet. By exposing this rodent species to culpeo fox and lesser grison faeces, we found that O. longicaudatus behavioural and physiological strategies were modulated depending on the predator’s diet. Specifically, rodents would trigger their antipredator responses in the presence of the most dangerous predator, the culpeo, which consumes a higher proportion of O. longicaudatus compared to the lesser grison. Our findings could be of importance for the development of more humane and efficient strategies to control rodent populations.Even though behavioural and physiological reactions to predation risk exhibited by prey species have received considerable attention in scientific journals, there are still many questions still unsolved. Our aim was to broaden the knowledge on one specific question: do long-tailed pygmy rice rats adapt their behavioural and physiological antipredator strategies depending on the predator species? For this question, we live-trapped in a temperate forest in Southern Chile long-tailed pygmy rice rats (Oligoryzomys longicaudatus), which were exposed to three predator odour phases (Phase 0: preliminary, no predator cues; Phase 1: one plot with culpeo fox faeces (Lycalopex culpaeus), one plot with lesser grison (Galictis cuja) faeces and one plot acting as a control with no odour; Phase 2: post treatment, no predator cues). We measured the behavioural response by the capture ratio. To assess the physiological stress response, we collected fresh faecal samples to quantify faecal corticosterone metabolites (FCM). Our results showed that O. longicaudatus increased both the capture ratio and FCM levels in the presence of culpeo cues. Culpeo foxes have higher densities in the study area than G. cuja and exhibit a higher activity pattern overlap with O. longicaudatus. Moreover, it has been also been reported in other regions that L. culpaeus consumption of O. longicaudatus is more frequent compared to G. cuja diet. The increase in capturability could be because traps can be regarded as a shelter in high-risk settings, but it can also be explained by the predator inspection behaviour. The increase in FCM concentrations during culpeo treatment can be linked to the adaptive mobilisation of energy to execute antipredator responses to increase survival chances.

Highlights

  • Predation risk drives the evolution of numerous prey adaptations [1,2]

  • Carnivore species found in the area include puma (Puma concolor), chilla fox (Lycalopex griseus), molina’s hognosed skunk (Conepatus chinga), güiña (Leopardus guigna), culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) and lesser grison (Galictis cuja) [36,37]

  • Results of the GLM analysing the capture ratio (Table 1), showed that there were statistically significant differences in capture probability depending on the predation risk treatment (Figure 1), with the culpeo treatment being the one with the highest capturability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There exists a vast variety of responses; in particular, behavioural and physiological adaptations are key to cope with predator pressure [3,4,5]. The most common behavioural responses to predation risk are linked to changes in daily activity patterns, use of space, social behaviour and feeding habits [6,7,8]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the presence of direct predator cues can prompt individuals to avoid those areas because the perceived predation risk is higher [3,9,10]. Previous field studies using live trapping to measure predator avoidance have found that rodents could consider traps as shelter in the presence of predator cues [11]. When the prey detects the presence of the predator, the stimulus triggers the activation of the hypothalamic–

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call