Long-Segment Versus Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Including Fractured Vertebrae for the Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures.

Abstract

Background For the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures, this study compared the results of short-segment fixation with fracture level inclusion (SSFIFL) with long-segment pedicle fixation (LSPF). Methodology In this prospective case series study conducted from January 2015 to January 2019, 80 patients with partial spinal cord lesions were investigated. For the comparison, two groups of 40 patients each were chosen and treated with SSFIFL and LSPF. The outcomes were measured using pre and postoperative radiological parameters and clinical parameters. The radiographic variables included the kyphotic angle with loss of correction, kyphotic deformation, and the Beck index. Mean blood loss, operative time, and cost-effectiveness were also examined for clinical indicators such as the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results There were no substantial variations between the groups regarding age or gender, trauma etiology, fracture level, or fracture pattern. Between the two categories, there appeared to be no notable change in radiological indicators such as kyphotic angle, kyphotic deformation, and Beck index at the end of follow-up (p = 0.120, 0.360, and 0.776, respectively). Both groups had similar neurological outcomes (p = 0.781). In terms of ODI and VAS, statistically, there was no discernible difference (p = 0.567 and 0.161, respectively). In this study, however, there was less surgical time, blood loss, and implant cost (p = 0.05). Conclusions When fracture level is included in a short-segment fixation, the radiological and clinical results are comparable to long-segment posterior fixation. Ultimately, this treatment has proven to be not only a motion segment-saving procedure but also cost-effective.