Long‐lasting disturbances in the equatorial ionospheric electric field simulated with a coupled magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere model

Abstract

The Magnetosphere‐Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Electrodynamics General Circulation model of Peymirat et al. [1998] is used to investigate ionospheric‐wind‐dynamo influences on low‐latitude ionospheric electric fields during and after a magnetic storm. Simulations are performed with time‐varying polar cap electric potentials and an expanding and contracting polar cap boundary. Three influences on equatorial electric fields can be of comparable importance: (1) global winds driven by solar heating; (2) direct penetration of polar cap electric fields to the equator that are partially shielded by the effects of Region‐2 field‐aligned currents; and (3) disturbance winds driven by high‐latitude heating and ion‐drag acceleration. The first two influences tend to have similar magnetic local time (MLT) variations in a steady state, while the disturbance‐wind influence tends to have the opposite MLT variations. The nighttime disturbance winds at upper midlatitudes that affect the global ionospheric wind dynamo are predominantly westward after the simulated magnetic storm. The nighttime winds drive an equatorward dynamo current that tends to charge the low‐latitude ionosphere positively around midnight, which can lead to reductions or reversals of the normal equatorial night‐side east‐west electric fields. The simulations partly support the theories of the so‐called “disturbance dynamo” [Blanc and Richmond, 1980] and “fossil wind” [Spiro et al., 1988], both of which predict long‐lasting disturbances in the equatorial eastward electric field associated with magnetic storms. However, the simulations do not support the element of fossil wind theory that links the disturbance‐wind influence on equatorial electric fields to polar cap contraction following the storm. The simulations show a stronger wind‐produced enhancement of steady state shielding than predicted by the model of Forbes and Harel [1989], due to the fact that the disturbance winds extend well equatorward of the Region‐2 currents.