Long-interval afferent inhibition measurement using two different methods: Normative values, repeatability and reliability

Abstract

BackgroundThe mechanism of Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition (SAI) is relatively well understood. In contrast, Long-Latency Afferent Inhibition (LAI) has not been as extensively studied as SAI, and its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Objective/HypothesisThis study had two primary objectives: first, to determine the optimal ISIs for LAI measured by amplitude changes (A-LAI) using high-resolution ISI ranges; and second, to compare measurements of LAI by threshold-tracking (T-LAI). MethodsTwenty-eight healthy volunteers (12 males aged 24- 45 years) participated in the study. Paired peripheral electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimuli (TS1mv) were applied at varying (ISIs)- 100, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 ms. ResultsBoth A-LAI and T-LAI showed that LAI decreased progressively from a peak at 200 or 250 ms to 1000 ms. Using the A-LAI method, pronounced inhibition was observed at three specific ISIs: 100 ms, 250 ms and 450 ms. When A-LAI values were converted to equivalent threshold changes, they did not differ significantly from T-LAI. Reliability at distinguishing individuals, as indicated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was greater for A-LAI, with a peak value of 0.82 at 250 ms. Conclusion(s)The study demonstrates that ISIs of 100 ms and 250 ms can be reliably used in amplitude measurement LAI. The study demonstrates that both LAI measurements record a similar decline of inhibition with increasing ISI.