Abstract

BACKGROUND:Humans demonstrate many physiological changes in microgravity for which long-duration head down bed rest (HDBR) is a reliable analog. However, information on how HDBR affects sensory processing is lacking.OBJECTIVE:We previously showed [25] that microgravity alters the weighting applied to visual cues in determining the perceptual upright (PU), an effect that lasts long after return. Does long-duration HDBR have comparable effects?METHODS:We assessed static spatial orientation using the luminous line test (subjective visual vertical, SVV) and the oriented character recognition test (PU) before, during and after 21 days of 6° HDBR in 10 participants. Methods were essentially identical as previously used in orbit [25].RESULTS:Overall, HDBR had no effect on the reliance on visual relative to body cues in determining the PU. However, when considering the three critical time points (pre-bed rest, end of bed rest, and 14 days post-bed rest) there was a significant decrease in reliance on visual relative to body cues, as found in microgravity. The ratio had an average time constant of 7.28 days and returned to pre-bed-rest levels within 14 days. The SVV was unaffected.CONCLUSIONS:We conclude that bed rest can be a useful analog for the study of the perception of static self-orientation during long-term exposure to microgravity. More detailed work on the precise time course of our effects is needed in both bed rest and microgravity conditions.

Highlights

  • Humans demonstrate many physiological changes in microgravity for which long-duration head down bed rest (HDBR) is a reliable analog

  • Given these limitations of the luminous line (LL) test, we developed an alternative measure of perceived self-orientation known as the Oriented Character Recognition Test (OChaRT) [21] for use in microgravity [25]

  • The subjective visual vertical (SVV) and perceptual upright (PU) showed no significant change with bed rest this does not necessarily mean that the weightings assigned to the various cues remained constant over the testing period

Read more

Summary

D OBJECTIVE

We previously showed [25] that microgravity alters the weighting applied to visual cues in determining the perceptual upright (PU), an effect that lasts long after return.

E METHODS
RESULTS
E CONCLUSIONS
Methods
Measuring the perceptual upright
Data analysis
Missing data and collapsing across intervention
Visual and gravity effects
The weighted vector sum model
Variance
Discussion
Comparison between HDBR and long-duration spaceflight

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.