Abstract
BackgroundIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world instituted various public-health measures. Our project aimed to highlight the most significant similarities and differences in key mental-health indicators between four Western and Northern European countries, and identify the population subgroups with the poorest mental-health outcomes during the first months of the pandemic.MethodsWe analysed time-series survey data of 205,084 individuals from seven studies from Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and the UK to assess the impact of the pandemic and associated lockdowns. All analyses focused on the initial lockdown phase (March–July 2020). The main outcomes were loneliness, anxiety, and COVID-19-related worries and precautionary behaviours.FindingsCOVID-19-related worries were consistently high in each country but decreased during the gradual reopening phases. While only 7% of the respondents reported high levels of loneliness in the Netherlands, percentages were higher in the rest of the three countries (13–18%). In all four countries, younger individuals and individuals with a history of mental illness expressed the highest levels of loneliness.InterpretationThe pandemic and associated country lockdowns had a major impact on the mental health of populations, and certain subgroups should be closely followed to prevent negative long-term consequences. Younger individuals and individuals with a history of mental illness would benefit from tailored public-health interventions to prevent or counteract the negative effects of the pandemic. Individuals across Western and Northern Europe have thus far responded in psychologically similar ways despite differences in government approaches to the pandemic.FundingSee the Funding section.
Highlights
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world instituted various public-health measures
Our study is the first to show consistency between mental-health landscapes and subgroup trends across four European countries, despite their varying governmental interventions, lockdown strategies, and general stringency. These findings suggest that a coordinated international strategy and increased collaboration would be effective in counteracting the negative impacts of the pandemic and its related lockdowns on mental health
Alongside the national governmental intervention timelines, we present the Oxford COVID-19: Government Response Tracker, [19] a score [0À100] that ranks a range of governmental policies in response to the pandemic
Summary
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world instituted various public-health measures. Findings: COVID-19-related worries were consistently high in each country but decreased during the gradual reopening phases. While only 7% of the respondents reported high levels of loneliness in the Netherlands, percentages were higher in the rest of the three countries (13À18%). Younger individuals and individuals with a history of mental illness expressed the highest levels of loneliness. Interpretation: The pandemic and associated country lockdowns had a major impact on the mental health of populations, and certain subgroups should be closely followed to prevent negative long-term consequences. Younger individuals and individuals with a history of mental illness would benefit from tailored publichealth interventions to prevent or counteract the negative effects of the pandemic. Individuals across Western and Northern Europe have far responded in psychologically similar ways despite differences in government approaches to the pandemic.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.