Abstract

In recent years, source provenance studies employing portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) technology have become commonplace in archaeology; however, they are not without critiques. Concerns center on the capability of instruments to produce valid results and researchers' abilities to accurately interpret those results and make correct source assignments. In this paper, we focus on the latter issue with a look towards statistical means of assigning artifacts to obsidian types using data provided by pXRF spectrometers. Using a sample of 677 obsidian artifacts from the northwestern Great Basin, we evaluate the ability of various approaches (principal components, cluster, and discriminant function analyses) to correctly assign artifacts to particular obsidian types. These multivariate methods generally work well to separate artifacts into different groups (i.e., obsidian types); however, they are less well-suited to assign individual artifacts to an obsidian source or type. We therefore tested the ability of the statistical program Fordisc, commonly used in forensic anthropology, to assign individual artifacts to specific geochemical obsidian sources or types. Our results indicate that Fordisc made accurate source assignments. Furthermore, because Fordisc provides probability values for different possible matches, it offers an advantage over other methods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call