Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Models for Predicting Whether Intensive Care Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium Remain As Such for at Least Two More Days.

Abstract

Background Some intensive care unit patients are alert and without delirium for atleast two consecutive days. These patients, like other critically ill individuals, are at risk for dignity-related distress. An interval ofat least two days would provide for apalliative care multidisciplinary team to be consulted in the late morning or afternoon of day one and visit the next day. An assessment would include the administration of the validated Patient Dignity Inventory in a reflective manner. To determine whether dignity-related distress can be identified and treated during patients' intensive care unit stay, we evaluated whether asubstantive fraction of such patients (≥5%) have asubstantial (>90%) probability ofremaining alert and without delirium in the intensive care unit for at least four consecutive days. Methods The retrospective cohort study used data from one large teaching hospital in the United States of America, from 2012 to June 2022. The inclusion criteria were: a)adults, b)present in an intensive care unit at 12 PM one day and continually sofor the next 48 hours, c)during those two days had every Riker sedation-agitation scale score "4, calm and cooperative," and d) during those two days had all Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) scores negative (i.e., no delirium) and all Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOS) scores less than three (i.e., no delirium). Results Among the 10,314 patients alert and without delirium in an intensive care unit over two-day periods that included threesuccessive 12PMs, 3,826 (37%) maintained this status for at least two successive 12PMs. Six patient characteristics (e.g., hemodynamic infusion or ventilatory support) had value in predicting those 37% ofpatients. However, logistic regression and classification models each predicted a few (≈0.2%) patients with >90% probability of maintaining these criteria. Forecasts were inaccurate for nearly all patients remaining alert and without delirium in the intensive care unit (≈37%) because the models predicted no patient alert, without delirium, and in the intensive care unit for twodays would remain so for at least four days. That ≈63% accuracy was improved upon by random forest machine learning, but only with ≈3% improvement. Conclusion Although many intensive care unit patients remain alert and without delirium for several consecutive days, each patient has a high daily probability of intensive care unit discharge or deterioration in medical condition. Therefore, the results of our prediction modeling show that care models for the assessment and treatment of patients with intensive care unit-associated dignity-related distress should not rely solely on the intensive care unit team but instead should be taken from the perspective ofthe entire hospitalization.