Abstract
We basically discuss the adequacy of paraconsistent logics for knowledge representation. The specific problem being investigated, in a preliminary manner, is that of the formalization (by a logic) of reasoning in the presence of contradictions. In doing this, we examine various logical principles underlying some rival paraconsistent logics in order to provide indications for determining whether a particular paraconsistent logic is appropriate (in general or in special cases) for application to knowledge representation. We also argue in what way paraconsistent logics have advantages over other approaches to automated reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
