Abstract
Two studies, one using 27 and the other 25 general psychology textbooks published between 1982 and 1989, compared several readability and human interest scores for topics presented in the appropriate context. In both cases, Flesch's (logical) scores were significantly correlated (median Pearson r of .49) with students' (empirical) ratings but insufficiently for justifying interchanging them. Another finding was that neither the students' ratings nor Flesch's scores based on the selections yielded significant correlations (median Pearson r of .21) with the corresponding Flesch scores for the books as a whole. An adequate profile of a book may require a number of readability and/or interest scores instead of single global measures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
