Abstract

Various logic-based frameworks have been proposed for <br />specifying the operational semantics of programming languages and <br />concurrent systems, including inference systems in the styles advocated by<br />Plotkin and by Kahn, Horn logic, equational specifications, reduction<br />systems for evaluation contexts, rewriting logic, and tile logic.<br />We consider the relationship between these frameworks, and assess their<br />respective merits and drawbacks - especially with regard to the modularity<br /> of specifications, which is a crucial feature for scaling up to practical<br />applications. We also report on recent work towards the use of the Maude<br />system (which provides an efficient implementation of rewriting logic) as<br />a meta-tool for operational semantics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.