Abstract

The paper suggests an analysis of the Confucian discourse and its logic through the prism of the M. McLuhan’s conception of the visual and audio-tactile cultures. Parallels between the Confucian ethics and that of I. Kant are led. There is asserted that the Confucian and Kantian ethics developed in different outlook context and on different cultural grounds, the latter doesn’t prevent them to pull together their positions in modern culture. In classical Confucianism we have the case of magical thinking, that exceeded from the so-called organismic outlook, according to which the Universe is something like a gigantic organism, every person, animal or other living creature is some sort of organ of this organism. Every organ has its proper place and function, the same concerns humans who, being parts of the Universe organism, have also their proper place and duties or, how it was called in China, their proper Tao. When everyone follows one’s tao anything in the Sublunar world goes in piece and harmony. All problems of social and natural character are caused by that some people got away from their tao, from their duties. Humans can become the humans only in society where some hierarchies and duties are supposed and members of the society are obliged to follow them. That means it is necessary to follow duty in order to be human. The philosophy of Kant, unlike that of Confucius, developed in quite another context, the context of rational culture of the visual type of perception. The result the Kant’s philosophy came in the sphere of ethics are similar to those of Confucianism. Both Kant and Confucianism affirm variants of the ethics of duty. But negating cosmological metaphysics, Kant deduces the latter from the reason itself, the famous categorical imperative prescribe to behave in accordance with norms that could become foundation of common legislacy. From here the problem of transition from the reason to outer reality arises. The problem, from attempts to solve that as a matter of fact, all later the so-called German classical philosophy developed. However, the answers given in its frame turned out to be not legitimite in the frame of the visual culture. In this context the ideas of Confucianism may be an alternative foundation to the ethics of duty.

Highlights

  • Стаття присвячена аналізові логіки конфуціанського дискурсу у її порівнянні з філософськими ідеями етики Імануїла Канта

  • Показується, що відмінності між конфуціанською та кантіанською етикою зумовлені абсолютно різним світоглядно‐метафізичним контекстом та його культурним підгрунтям – магічним та аудіотактильним у випадку Конфуція та раціонально‐сциєнтиським і візуальним у випадку Канта – що тим не менш не заважає тому, що їхні висновки та герменевтичне тлумачення в контексті сучасної культури зближуються майже до повного співпадіння

  • In classical Confucianism we have the case of magical thinking, that exceeded from the so‐called organismic outlook, according to which the Universe is something like a gigantic organism, every person, animal or other living creature is some sort of organ of this organism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Стаття присвячена аналізові логіки конфуціанського дискурсу у її порівнянні з філософськими ідеями етики Імануїла Канта. Тобто для того щоб бути людиною потрібно слідувати обов’язку.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call