Abstract
ABSTRACT This article compares the results-based management (RBM) approach with the logical framework (LFA) and program logic model (PLM) approaches which preceded it. Each of the methods is presented with the elements of the results chain, and their impacts are compared. RBM approaches have de-emphasized inputs, therefore de-emphasized classical efficiency concerns. The author points to the importance of emphasis on results for project managers, the failures in the past of not having an exchange among the approaches, and recommends the importance of such an exchange in the future.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
