Abstract
When looking for new and faster parallel sorting algorithms for use in massively parallel systems it is tempting to investigate promising alternatives from the large body of research done on parallel sorting in the field of theoretical computer science. Such “theoretical” algorithms are mainly described for the PRAM (Parallel Random Access Machine) model of computation [13,26]. This paper shows how this kind of investigation can be done on a simple but versatile environment for programming and measuring of PRAM algorithms [19,20]. The practical value of Cole's Parallel Merge Sort algorithm [10,11] have been investigated by comparing it with Batcher's bitonic sorting [5]. The O(log n) time consumption of Cole's algorithm implies that it must be faster than bitonic sorting which is O(log2n) time-if n is large enough. However, we have found that bitonic sorting is faster as long as n is less than 1.2 x 1021, i.e. more than 1 Giga Tera items!. Consequently, Cole's logarithmic time algorithm is not fast in practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
