Abstract
24 male internals and 24 male externals performed a pursuit-rotor task under conditions of task reinforcement or combined reinforcement (task and verbal reinforcements). Verbal reinforcement was praise from the experimenter; task reinforcement was a buzzer heard when the stylus contacted the target. Analysis yielded a significant interaction effect of I-E × Trials × Mode of Reinforcement. Externals performed better with combined reinforcement whereas, internals performed equally well under both conditions. Mode of reinforcement may enter differential performance by internals and externals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
