Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) models of fossil bones are increasingly available, thus opening a novel frontier in the study of organismal size and shape evolution. We provide an example of how photogrammetry can be combined with Geometric Morphometrics (GMM) techniques to study patterns of morphological convergence in the mammalian group of Xenarthra. Xenarthrans are currently represented by armadillos, sloths, and anteaters. However, this clade shows an incredibly diverse array of species and ecomorphotypes in the fossil record, including gigantic ground sloths and glyptodonts. Since the humerus is a weight-bearing bone in quadrupedal mammals and its morphology correlates with locomotor behavior, it provides an ideal bone to gain insight into adaptations of fossil species. A 3D sample of humerii belonging to extant and fossil Xenarthra allowed us to identify a significant phylogenetic signal and a strong allometric component in the humerus shape. Although no rate shift in the evolution of the humerus shape was recorded for any clade, fossorial and arboreal species humerii did evolve at significantly slower and faster paces, respectively, than the rest of the Xenarthran species. Significant evidence for morphological convergence found among the fossorial species and between the two tree sloth genera explains these patterns. These results suggest that the highly specialized morphologies of digging taxa and tree sloths represent major deviations from the plesiomorphic Xenarthran body plan, evolved several times during the history of the group.

Highlights

  • Species morphology varies in size and shape

  • We explored Xenarthran humerus 3D morphology using Geometric Morphometrics (GMM) within a comparative framework

  • We provided on several occasions examples on how comparative methods can be implemented in macroevolutionary studies incorporating fossils and GMM (Meloro and Raia, 2010; Raia et al, 2010; Meloro and Slater, 2012; Piras et al, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species morphology varies in size and shape These two components can be strongly correlated to each other (Shingleton et al, 2007; Figueirido et al, 2011; Voje et al, 2014; Klingenberg, 2016) and somewhat limited by the existence of evolutionary constraints (Gould, 1989; Brakefield, 2006; Arnold, 2015; Meloro et al, 2015a). In this regard, the vertebrate skeleton has been intensively investigated, because the shape of its components is greatly influenced by body size and by the constraints impinging on specific adaptations linked to body support and other essential organismal functions (e.g., locomotion, feeding). The appreciation of fossil diversity provides strong support for the existence of size-induced shape changes (allometry) across different taxonomic scales and several components of the skeleton (Speed and Arbuckle, 2016).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call