Abstract

Parametric kernel methods currently dominate the literature regarding the construction of animal home ranges (HRs) and utilization distributions (UDs). These methods frequently fail to capture the kinds of hard boundaries common to many natural systems. Recently a local convex hull (LoCoH) nonparametric kernel method, which generalizes the minimum convex polygon (MCP) method, was shown to be more appropriate than parametric kernel methods for constructing HRs and UDs, because of its ability to identify hard boundaries (e.g., rivers, cliff edges) and convergence to the true distribution as sample size increases. Here we extend the LoCoH in two ways: “fixed sphere-of-influence,” or r-LoCoH (kernels constructed from all points within a fixed radius r of each reference point), and an “adaptive sphere-of-influence,” or a-LoCoH (kernels constructed from all points within a radius a such that the distances of all points within the radius to the reference point sum to a value less than or equal to a), and compare them to the original “fixed-number-of-points,” or k-LoCoH (all kernels constructed from k-1 nearest neighbors of root points). We also compare these nonparametric LoCoH to parametric kernel methods using manufactured data and data collected from GPS collars on African buffalo in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Our results demonstrate that LoCoH methods are superior to parametric kernel methods in estimating areas used by animals, excluding unused areas (holes) and, generally, in constructing UDs and HRs arising from the movement of animals influenced by hard boundaries and irregular structures (e.g., rocky outcrops). We also demonstrate that a-LoCoH is generally superior to k- and r-LoCoH (with software for all three methods available at http://locoh.cnr.berkeley.edu).

Highlights

  • Ecology is currently undergoing a revolution in terms of our ability to collect large sets of data with unprecedented precision on the position of individuals in the landscape at regularly spaced intervals of time

  • GPS position data is often used to construct home ranges (HRs) [3,4,5,6] or utilization distributions (UDs) [7,8,9,10,11,12,13], where the former are bounded areas used by animals for some defined purpose, while the latter are represented by isopleths demarcating regions in space with different probabilities or rates of usage by individuals

  • For comparative and other reasons enumerated below, bounds on the innermost 95% of the data are used to estimate the areas of HRs even for methods of construction that are able to produce HRs bounded by a 100% isopleth of a UD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecology is currently undergoing a revolution in terms of our ability to collect large sets of data with unprecedented precision on the position of individuals in the landscape (e.g. plus-minus several meters using current GPS technology [1]) at regularly spaced intervals of time. This revolution is leading to the emergence of movement ecology, a new subfield of ecology [2]. Use of the 95% isopleth to bound HRs may change in view of Borger et al.’s [21] recent study in which they recommend estimating the area of HRs using isopleths in the 50–90% range. They demonstrate that using isopleths in this range produces area estimates that are less biased by sample size than when using isopleths above 90% or below 50% (the latter sometimes being used to estimate core areas of HR use)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call