Abstract
Basalt fibers are receiving increasing consideration because they seem to be adequate as reinforcement of composites and to comply with the environmental safeguard rules. However, many factors affect the performance of composite material, demanding specific testing; one may be performance assessment under impact tests. The attention of the present work is focused on the detection of impact damage in basalt-based composites with two non-destructive testing techniques: lock-in thermography (LT) and ultrasonic testing (UT). Two different types of materials are considered which both include basalt fibers as reinforcement but two different matrices: Polyamide and polypropylene. Polypropylene is used either pure or modified with the addition of a coupling agent; the latter improves the fiber/matrix interface strength, giving in practice, a material of different characteristics. Specimens are first subjected to low-velocity impact tests and then non-destructively examined with the two above mentioned techniques. The obtained results are analyzed and compared to highlight the advantages and limitations of the two techniques to detect impact damage in basalt-based composites. Both techniques seem effective for the inspection of polyamide/basalt composite; in particular, there is a general agreement between results. Conversely, UT seems not suitable for the inspection of polypropylene/basalt composites because of their superficial porosity, while lock-in thermography is effective also for this type of composite material.
Highlights
The development of new materials is an increasingly topical issue of great interest to both the academic and the industrial communities
A woven basalt fibers fabric, plain weave type, with a specific mass of 210 g/m2, from Incotelogy, GmbH is used as reinforcement of two types of matrix: Polypropylene and polyamide
Results are presented as phase images for lock-in thermography (LT) and as C-scan and B-scan images, amplitude top and sectional views respectively, for ultrasonic testing (UT); data are compared to highlight the advantages and limitations of the two techniques
Summary
The development of new materials is an increasingly topical issue of great interest to both the academic and the industrial communities. The hope is to be able to get eco-friendly composite materials which include both the matrix and reinforcement of natural derivation and which perform better, or at least similar to the most common composites of petrochemical derivation. This seems not completely achievable yet; what is instead possible is to reduce the problems of waste disposal. In this context, thermoplastic matrix-based composites (TC), thanks to their potential recyclability after their life-cycle, offer some advantages over their thermoset counterparts [1].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
