Abstract

This paper develops the argument that post-COVID-19 recovery strategies need to focus on building back fairer cities and communities, and that this requires a strong embedding of 'age-friendly' principles to support marginalised groups of older people, especially those living in deprived urban neighbourhoods, trapped in poor quality housing. It shows that older people living in such areas are likely to experience a 'double lockdown' as a result of restrictions imposed by social distancing combined with the intensification of social and spatial inequalities. This argument is presented as follows: first, the paper examines the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on older people, highlighting how the pandemic is both creating new and reinforcing existing inequalities in ageing along the lines of gender, class, ethnicity, race, ability and sexuality. Second, the paper explores the role of spatial inequalities in the context of COVID-19, highlighting how the pandemic is having a disproportionate impact on deprived urban areas already affected by cuts to public services, the loss of social infrastructure and pressures on the voluntary sector. Finally, the paper examines how interrelated social inequalities at both the individual and spatial level are affecting the lives of older people living in deprived urban neighbourhoods during the pandemic. The paper concludes by developing six principles for 'age-friendly' community recovery planning aimed at maintaining and improving the quality of life and wellbeing of older residents in the post-pandemic city.

Highlights

  • This paper makes the argument for developing ‘age-friendly’ recovery strategies in the context of growing inequalities affecting urban neighbourhoods. It does this by exploring the social impact of the COVID19 pandemic, with a particular focus on issues facing older people living in urban environments

  • A combination of widening inequalities within and between urban environments, and the impact of austerity on local government and city budgets, has raised questions about future progress in age-friendly and related activities (Buffel et al, 2018). To these pressures may be added the impact of COVID-19, with the pandemic having its greatest impact on areas characterised by high levels of deprivation, often with ageing populations, poor quality housing and communities experiencing long-term decline through de-industrialisation (Beatty and Fothergill, 2021; Marmot et al, 2021; Phillipson et al, 2021; Sun et al, 2021)

  • By bringing together perspectives from urban studies with research on ageing from social gerontology, this paper offers a novel analysis of the ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic is creating new and reinforcing existing inequalities in the ageing population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper makes the argument for developing ‘age-friendly’ recovery strategies in the context of growing inequalities affecting urban neighbourhoods. A combination of widening inequalities within and between urban environments, and the impact of austerity on local government and city budgets, has raised questions about future progress in age-friendly and related activities (Buffel et al, 2018) To these pressures may be added the impact of COVID-19, with the pandemic having its greatest impact on areas characterised by high levels of deprivation, often with ageing populations, poor quality housing and communities experiencing long-term decline through de-industrialisation (Beatty and Fothergill, 2021; Marmot et al, 2021; Phillipson et al, 2021; Sun et al, 2021). Given this context, shielding and self-isolation may be especially difficult for older people from ethnic minority groups, with the accompanying danger of risk of exposure to infection from COVID-19

Discussion
Findings
Developing locally based partnerships across organisational boundaries
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call