Abstract
In the article by Bruchovsky et al.,1 intermittent androgen suppression was evaluated in patients with clinically locally advanced prostate cancer who developed biochemical disease recurrence after radiotherapy. We consider it to be of utmost important to improve currently existing knowledge regarding intermittent androgen suppression, which could be a feasible approach as adjuvant or salvage therapy for prostate cancer in selected patients. The authors concluded that the baseline and nadir levels of prostate-specific antigen are major predictors of response to androgen suppression. Nevertheless, it was not clear whether patients suspected of having local disease recurrence rather than systemic disease recurrence2 (and who therefore had disease that was amenable to local salvage treatment with curative intent rather than androgen suppression) were excluded from this analysis.3 Furthermore, it is unclear which definition of biochemical disease recurrence after radiotherapy was considered by the authors because false diagnoses of biochemical disease recurrence are not infrequent in prostate cancer patients who are treated with radiotherapy.4 We believe that including patients with local disease recurrence or a false diagnosis of biochemical disease recurrence could have biased the results of the study by Bruchovsky et al. Finally, it is important to remember that the combination of cyproterone acetate and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (Gn-RH) analogue is reported to have a significantly more unfavorable outcome compared with the use of Gn-RH alone and an even worse outcome compared with maximum androgen blockade with nilutamide or flutamide.5
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.