Abstract
In recent decades, governments of different persuasions have tended to indulge in a new “initiation ritual” on their entry to the White Hall. The ritual is planning-bashing. Since the first planning Act came into force in 1947, planners have been frequently blamed for everything that has ever gone wrong particularly with the economy. Strikingly similar assertions have been used by governments to describe the perceived and actual deficiencies of the planning system and to justify its reform. In the 2000s, the pace of reforms reached a record breaking height as planning experienced three “radical” changes in 2004, 2008 and 20ii. The latter was initiated as soon as the Liberal Democrat-Conservative Coalition Government took office in May 2010. Like many of their predecessors, they demonised planning as being the “enemy of enterprise” and stifling wealth creation. This, of course, is not the first time that a center-right government attempts to follow its political preference for smaller state, greater market freedom, deregulation and narrower scope for the planning system. Mrs. Thatcher did that in the 1980s. However, while she did it under the banner of, “there is no such thing as a society”, the new Coalition Government is doing it in the name of “Big Society” and “Localism”. This is powerful rhetoric which can easily obscure the underlying neo-liberal motivation for change. The reform has now been legislated in the Localism Act 2011. The main provisions of the Act fall under four headings (DCLG 2011a, p. 6) 1. “New freedoms and flexibilities for local government 2. New rights and powers for communities and individuals 3. Reform to make the planning system more democratic and more effective 4. Reform to ensure that decisions about housing are taken locally” For the sake of brevity, I will focus on the third heading and more specifically on three major changes to the planning system: the abolition of the Regional Strategies, the introduction of the Neighborhood Planning, and the publication of the Draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.