Abstract

The current controversy regarding the validity of local working requirement in domestic legislations rises from the contradictory provisions under the Paris Convention and the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) Agreement. While the former recognizes 'failure to work' as a ground for granting compulsory licenses, the latter specifically requires non-discrimination on the basis of 'whether products are imported or locally produced'. The question, then, remains whether these two provisions can be reconciled with each other as the provisions of Paris Convention were specifically incorporated in the TRIPS Agreement through reference. In this paper, I would attempt to analyse the intent, effect and legislative history of these seemingly conflicting provisions, to arrive at a plausible reconciliation of local working requirement under the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.