Abstract

Most studies indicate that the mechanical removal of the bacterial biofilm from the implant surface is the central goal of peri-implantitis therapy. However, controversial results in the treatment of peri-implantitis have led to the consideration of additional strategies that include surgical approaches and chemical adjuvants. Local/topical antibiotics, such as minocycline, azithromycin, tetracycline, amoxicillin, doxycycline, and metronidazole, may improve the efficacy of the definitive treatment of the disease, but the lack of conclusive findings prevents their use in clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of local/topical antibiotics for peri-implantitis treatment. Randomised controlled studies (RCT) on patients with peri-implantitis and comparing the efficacy of local/topical antibiotics vs. placebo or mechanical debridement were included. A systematic search strategy was carried out using three registered databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus). RoB2 was used to assess risk of bias. Five RCTs were identified (n = 250 patients and 333 implants). Contrast results emerged among the included studies, and a high heterogeneity level was observed. Risk of bias revealed some concerns for three studies out of five, while one study was judged at high risk. Only one study analysed the limitations of its findings. Overall, local antibiotic use can be considered a valid approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Therefore, future long-term clinical trials with standardised protocols and antibiotics with similar biological activity profiles should be tested to achieve a valid and definitive conclusion.

Highlights

  • Peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis are included within the peri-implant disease concept [1]

  • There are very few existing studies that report on etiological periimplantitis treatment in isolation

  • Enough current studies have proven that in peri-implantitis treatment, the elimination of the bacterial biofilm from the implant surface either through surgical or non-surgical access should be supplemented by chemical adjunct therapeutic approaches through surgical access

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis are included within the peri-implant disease concept [1]. Peri-implantitis prevalence has been observed in 19.83% of subjects and 9.25% of implant sites, while 46.83% of subjects and 29.48% of implants develop peri-implant mucositis [2]. Peri-implantitis is a progressive and irreversible disease of implant-surrounding hard and soft tissues, associated with progressive bone loss, bone resorption, decreased osseointegration, increased pocket formation, and purulence [2,3]. Peri-implant mucositis refers to a reversible inflammatory process in the soft tissues and connective tissues adjacent to the implant [4]. Analysing the aetiology, pathophysiology, risk assessment, and therapy of peri-implantitis, many studies have observed a strong level of similarity between the two pathologies and suggested similar therapeutic approaches [7,8]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call