Abstract

One important problem in radiation therapy for cancer treatment is the selection of the set of beam angles radiation will be delivered from. A primary goal in this problem is to find a beam angle configuration (BAC) that leads to a clinically acceptable treatment plan. Further, this process must be done within clinically acceptable times. Since the problem of selecting beam angles in radiation therapy is known to be extremely hard to solve as well as time-consuming, both exact algorithms and population-based heuristics might not be suitable to solve this problem. In this paper, we compare two matheuristic methods based on local search algorithms, to approximately solve the beam angle optimisation problem (BAO). Although the steepest descent algorithm is able to find locally optimal BACs for the BAO problem, it takes too long before convergence, which is not acceptable in clinical practice. Thus, we propose to use a next descent algorithm that converges quickly to good quality solutions although no (local) optimality guarantee is given. We apply our two matheuristic methods on a prostate case which considers two organs at risk, namely, the rectum and the bladder. Results show that the matheuristic algorithm based on the next descent local search is able to quickly find solutions as good as the ones found by the steepest descent algorithm.

Highlights

  • Radiation is one of the most common therapies used to treat patients suffering from cancer

  • It is clear from here that the selection of beam angles in the beam angle optimisation (BAO) phase has a big impact on the quality of the fluence map computed in the fluence map optimisation (FMO) phase

  • A good combination of beam angles will lead to a good quality fluence map and, will produce a good quality treatment plan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radiation is one of the most common therapies used to treat patients suffering from cancer. In the FMO problem, we determine the radiation intensities that will be delivered from each beam angle. The solution to this problem is a vector of intensities that is called fluence map. We need to find efficient strategies that produce good quality treatment plans within these time limits; that is, not too many BACs can be evaluated during the optimisation process. For this reason, sophisticated (meta-)heuristic algorithms such as population-based algorithms might not be suitable for solving this problem.

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
Local Search-Based Matheuristic Algorithms for BAO
Computational Experiments
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call