Abstract

The role that local people's congresses (LPCs) play in Chinese politics is somewhat unexpected. One might have thought that the crucial question about LPCs centers on how representative they are. What stands out in recent research, however, is how little attention is devoted to elections, deputy-constituent ties, and speaking out at plenary sessions. The big story, instead, is occurring inside the state and concerns institutionalization, multi-step deliberation, lawmaking, and enhanced oversight. Administrative reforms have transformed the policy process and new arenas have been created to manage conflict. LPCs have benefited greatly from this re-division of labor and are not a rival show or a rubber stamp but partners in governance that provide a venue for interested parties (mostly within the bureaucracy) to work out disagreements. Energetic LPCs are first and foremost a sign that where Chinese politics takes place has changed. Legislative development, in this way of thinking, has less to do with responsiveness and altered state-society relations and more to do with state-building, restructuring bureaucratic ties, and making Party rule predictable and effective.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.