Abstract
This study aims to analyze the extent to whichpolitical system factors influence media election coverage by investigating the local election press coverage in Norway and Sweden. According to Hallin and Mancini’s framework on media systems, both countries belong to the Democratic Corporatist Model. But despite these similarities there are differences between the politicaland media systems in the Nordic countries. One important distinction is when elections are held. In Sweden, elections to national, regional and local parliaments take place on the same day every fourth year. In Norway, local and regional elections are held in-between national elections in four-year cycles. The design of the study can be characterized as a most similar system design. Media system and the political system are similar, but when local/regional elections take place in relation to national elections are different. In line with theories of second-order elections, a number of hypotheses can be proposed, where national politics is supposed to be more influential in local election coverage in Norway compared with Sweden. This because research on second-order elections state that second order elections (such as local/regional elections) tend to be characterized as barometer- elections, as a poll, evaluating the national government and how the development of national economy develops. The empirical analyses are based on a content analysis executed on four local newspapers in Norway and Sweden in the local elections in 2007 (Norway) and 2006 (Sweden) during the last two weeks of the election campaigns.
Highlights
On Election Day the democratic principle of political equality most effectively comes into play [1]
This study aims to find out how political system factors influence the media election coverage, by analyzing the local/regional election press coverage in Norway and Sweden
The results show a limited interest from the media to cover regional election campaigns, even when national election is separated from local and regional elections
Summary
On Election Day the democratic principle of political equality most effectively comes into play [1]. Some people are more engaged and have more power and political resources than others, but on Election Day, each and every citizen has one and only one vote. Ever since the classic study The People’s Choiceby Lazarsfeld, Berelson and Gaudet in the 1940s, political scientists and media scholars have carried out content analyses to study the impact, newsworthiness and bias of election coverage [5,6,7]. These studies are usually cross-sectional, with one campaign analyzed in a single country [8,7]. There are examples of comparisons over time, [9,10,11] and there is a growing interest for cross-national studies [12,13,14]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
