Abstract
BackgroundContinental-scale aboveground biomass maps are increasingly available, but their estimates vary widely, particularly at high resolution. A comprehensive understanding of map discrepancies is required to improve their effectiveness in carbon accounting and local decision-making. To this end, we compare four continental-scale maps with a recent high-resolution lidar-derived biomass map over Maryland, USA. We conduct detailed comparisons at pixel-, county-, and state-level.ResultsSpatial patterns of biomass are broadly consistent in all maps, but there are large differences at fine scales (RMSD 48.5–92.7 Mg ha−1). Discrepancies reduce with aggregation and the agreement among products improves at the county level. However, continental scale maps exhibit residual negative biases in mean (33.0–54.6 Mg ha−1) and total biomass (3.5–5.8 Tg) when compared to the high-resolution lidar biomass map. Three of the four continental scale maps reach near-perfect agreement at ~4 km and onward but do not converge with the high-resolution biomass map even at county scale. At the State level, these maps underestimate biomass by 30–80 Tg in forested and 40–50 Tg in non-forested areas.ConclusionsLocal discrepancies in continental scale biomass maps are caused by factors including data inputs, modeling approaches, forest/non-forest definitions and time lags. There is a net underestimation over high biomass forests and non-forested areas that could impact carbon accounting at all levels. Local, high-resolution lidar-derived biomass maps provide a valuable bottom-up reference to improve the analysis and interpretation of large-scale maps produced in carbon monitoring systems.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13021-015-0030-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Continental-scale aboveground biomass maps are increasingly available, but their estimates vary widely, at high resolution
Accurate maps of forest aboveground biomass are critical for reducing uncertainties in the carbon cycle and informing carbon management decisions [1,2,3]
Huang et al Carbon Balance Manage (2015) 10:19 continental scale reporting, there is a need to examine local discrepancies more closely as errors or uncertainty at fine-scales can complicate the use of coarse scale maps in local planning and decision making
Summary
Continental-scale aboveground biomass maps are increasingly available, but their estimates vary widely, at high resolution. A comprehensive understanding of map discrepancies is required to improve their effectiveness in carbon accounting and local decision-making To this end, we compare four continental-scale maps with a recent high-resolution lidar-derived biomass map over Maryland, USA. Almost all large-area biomass maps are derived from two-dimensional remote sensing data that have wide coverage but are generally less sensitive to canopy structure, in moderate to high biomass forests (e.g. multispectral and single polarized SAR). They do not currently include fine scale variations in tree cover because of their coarse spatial resolution. An alternative is to use high-resolution lidar derived biomass maps, where available, to evaluate existing coarse scale maps, and make them more compatible for decision-making
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
