Abstract
AbstractSr2GdAlO5:Ce and Sr3AlO4F:Ce are isostructural phosphors in which the Ce3+ 4f‐5d1 transition can be efficiently excited by a photon with energy lower than 3.1 eV. Herein, we analyze the crystal chemistry of the Ce3+ local coordination, compare the thermal quenching behavior and construct the electronic structure of Ce3+ in them. The Rietveld refinement on two occupancy models suggests that Gd3+ only occupies the 8h site in Sr2GdAlO5; this provides a hint on the preferred occupancy of dopant Ce3+ in this site. The large crystal filed splitting of Ce8h is mainly due to the fact that the 8h site is bonded to two oxygen with relatively short dSr/Gd‐O and forms a quasi‐square antiprism which experiences a large distortion. The Ce3+ 5d‐4f luminescence in Sr3AlO4F is much more stable against thermal quenching than that in Sr2GdAlO5, as evidenced by the temperature‐dependent luminescence intensity and luminescence decay studies. The energy of the O2−‐Eu3+/2+ and O2−‐Ce4+/3+ charge transfer as well as bandgap were estimated and the electronic structure of Ce3+ were constructed. A larger energy barrier ΔEdC between the Ce3+ 5d1 level and the conduction band bottom in Sr3AlO4F is seen from the Vacuum Referred Binding Energy (VRBE) diagrams which explains the higher thermal quenching temperature by thermal ionization model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.