Abstract

Despite the challenges wildland fire poses to contemporary resource management, many fire-prone ecosystems have adapted over centuries to millennia to intentional landscape burning by people to maintain resources. We combine fieldwork, modeling, and a literature survey to examine the extent and mechanism by which anthropogenic burning alters the spatial grain of habitat mosaics in fire-prone ecosystems. We survey the distribution of Callitris intratropica, a conifer requiring long fire-free intervals for establishment, as an indicator of long-unburned habitat availability under Aboriginal burning in the savannas of Arnhem Land. We then use cellular automata to simulate the effects of burning identical proportions of the landscape under different fire sizes on the emergent patterns of habitat heterogeneity. Finally, we examine the global extent of intentional burning and diversity of objectives using the scientific literature. The current distribution of Callitris across multiple field sites suggested long-unburnt patches are common and occur at fine scales (<0.5 ha), while modeling revealed smaller, patchy disturbances maximize patch age diversity, creating a favorable habitat matrix for Callitris. The literature search provided evidence for intentional landscape burning across multiple ecosystems on six continents, with the number of identified objectives ranging from two to thirteen per study. The fieldwork and modeling results imply that the occurrence of long-unburnt habitat in fire-prone ecosystems may be an emergent property of patch scaling under fire regimes dominated by smaller fires. These findings provide a model for understanding how anthropogenic burning alters spatial and temporal aspects of habitat heterogeneity, which, as the literature survey strongly suggests, warrant consideration across a diversity of geographies and cultures. Our results clarify how traditional fire management shapes fire-prone ecosystems, which despite diverse objectives, has allowed human societies to cope with fire as a recurrent disturbance.

Highlights

  • Wildfire poses enormous challenges for contemporary land management and resource protection

  • Despite the complexity of factors influencing fire behavior and effects, the relative simplicity of our study system and modeling approach provide a unique opportunity to examine a fundamental question of patch mosaic burning: how does human mediation of fire size, irrespective of area burned, alter habitat complexity? We argue that this question is critical to understanding traditional fire management as a coupled human and natural system at the global scale, both in terms of how intentional burning has shaped baseline ecological patterns and how the outcomes of landscape burning give rise to fireresilient communities and landscapes

  • The 134 groves we measured were consistently small, ranging from 0.005 to 0.34 ha with a median size of 0.025 ha. These data provided context in terms of indicating the ‘grain’ at which long-unburnt habitat is available in this ecosystem, whereas we turned to the cellular automaton (CA) simulations to provide insight into the mechanisms by which habitat mosaics are shaped by fire disturbance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wildfire poses enormous challenges for contemporary land management and resource protection. Policy discourse has shifted from outright fire suppression to building fire-adapted and fire-resilient landscapes and communities. A key to achieving sustainable coexistence with fire is in better understanding the ancient nexus between humans and flammable landscapes. 1 million years ago (Pausas and Keeley 2009), and evidence indicates burning by modern humans has altered vegetation and other resources across large spatial scales. Recent departures from traditional cultural use and perceptions of fire are associated with major shifts in ecological composition, ranging from local-scale shrub encroachment and forest degradation to regional- and continental-scale changes in vegetation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call