Abstract

BackgroundPulmonary artery angioplasty (PAA) is an important surgical procedure to complete radical resection with maximum preservation of functioning pulmonary tissues when the pulmonary artery is involved. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of PAA using video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus open thoracotomy (OT) in lung cancer surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 214 patients who underwent PAA between November 2005 and October 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce confounding effects. The survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe final sample included 203 patients (28 patients in the VATS group and 175 patients in the OT group). There were no differences between the two groups in operative time, blood loss, duration of chest tube drainage, postoperative hospital stays, margin status, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and number of N1 and N2 stations or number of N1 and N2 lymph nodes both before and after matching. At a median follow-up period of 43 (range, 6 to 158) months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the overall cohort were 47.9% and 42.1%, respectively. The 5-year OS and RFS were comparable between the VATS and OT groups both in the overall cohort and the matched cohort. The VATS procedure was found not to have a prognostic impact on either OS (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.30, P=0.647) or RFS (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.10, P=0.666).ConclusionsVATS PAA is associated with comparable short- and long-term outcomes in selected patients with lung cancer compared with OT.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.