Loading protocols for quasi-static cyclic testing of flexure dominated reinforced concrete circular bridge columns under crustal, subcrustal, and subduction earthquakes

Abstract

Experimental procedures involving quasi-static cyclic tests have been the most prevalent for seismic performance assessments of structural and non-structural components and systems. However, there is a lack of consensus among experimentalists and researchers on a standard loading protocol. This study aims to propose a set of standard loading protocols representative of the seismic demands imposed on typical flexure dominated reinforced concrete bridge columns under uniaxial bending. Variable parameters: axial-load ratio, aspect ratio, longitudinal and spiral reinforcement ratios, concrete compressive strength, and steel yield strength were initially screened for significance in terms of their influence on the number of inelastic cycles and cumulative displacement ductility - two key reference parameters for the development of loading protocols. The number of inelastic cycles cumulative displacement ductility were then determined for reinforced concrete bridge columns having unique combinations of upper and lower levels of the significant parameters under different earthquake types (crustal, subcrustal, subduction) and displacement ductility demand levels (2, 4, 8). These target ductility demands intend to capture a wide range of structural responses including minimal and collapse damage states. Statistical analyses revealed that for the considered bridge columns, it is feasible to develop one representative loading protocol for each earthquake type and target displacement ductility demand level. Hence, nine loading protocols were proposed and then compared against equivalent loading protocols found in standards and literature. Standard protocols were found to impose unrealistic damage on bridge columns subjected to crustal and subcrustal earthquake hazards leading to inaccurate assessments. The proposed loading protocols for subduction earthquakes had a comparable number of inelastic cycles to those found in the literature for the same earthquake hazard and are representative of the seismic demands imposed on bridge columns.