Load increases IMU signal attenuation per step but reduces IMU signal attenuation per kilometre

Abstract

BackgroundDespite deleterious biomechanics associated with injury, particularly as it pertains to load carriage, there is limited research on the association between physical demands and variables captured with wearable sensors. While inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used as surrogate measures of ground reaction force (GRF) variables, it is unclear if these data are sensitive to military-specific task demands. Research questionCan wearable sensors characterise physical load and demands placed on individuals in different load, speed and grade conditions? MethodsData were collected on 20 individuals who were self-reportedly free from current injury, recreationally active, and capable of donning 23 kg in the form of a weighted vest. Each participant walked and ran on flat, uphill (+6 %) and downhill (-6 %) without and with load (23 kg). Data were collected synchronously from optical motion capture (OMC) and IMUs placed on the distal limb and the pelvis. Data from an 8-second window was used to generate a participant-based mean of OMC and IMU variables of interest. Repeated Measures ANOVA was used to measure main and interaction effects of load, speed, and grade. Simple linear regression was used to elucidate a relationship between OMC measures and estimated metabolic cost (EMC) to IMU measures. ResultsLoad reduces foot and pelvic accelerations (p<0.001) but elevate signal attenuation per step (p=0.044). Conversely, attenuation per kilometre is lowered with the addition of load (p=0.017). Uphill had the lowest attenuation per step (p=0.003) and kilometre (p≤0.033) in walking, while downhill had the greatest attenuation per step (p≤0.002) and per kilometre (p≤0.004). Attenuation measures are inconsistently moderately related to limb negative work (R≤0.57). EMC is moderately positively related to unloaded running (R≥0.39), and moderately negatively related to walking with and without load (R≤-0.52). SignificanceWhile load reduces peak accelerations at both the pelvis and foot. However, it may increase demand on the lower extremity to attenuate the signal between the two sensors with each step, while attenuation over time reduces with load.