Abstract
The smallest details of living systems are molecular devices that operate between the classical and quantum levels, i.e. between the potential dimension (microscale) and the actual three-dimensional space (macroscale). They realize non-demolition quantum measurements in which time appears as a mesoscale dimension separating contradictory statements in the course of actualization. These smaller devices form larger devices (macromolecular complexes), up to living body. The quantum device possesses its own potential internal quantum state (IQS), which is maintained for prolonged time via error-correction being a reflection over this state. Decoherence-free IQS can exhibit itself by a creative generation of iteration limits in the real world. To avoid a collapse of the quantum information in the process of correcting errors, it is possible to make a partial measurement that extracts only the error-information and leaves the encoded state untouched. In natural quantum computers, which are living systems, the error-correction is internal. It is a result of reflection, given as a sort of a subjective process allotting optimal limits of iteration. The IQS resembles the properties of a quasi-particle, which interacts with the surround, applying decoherence commands to it. In this framework, enzymes are molecular automata of the extremal quantum computer, the set of which maintains stable highly ordered coherent state, and genome represents a concatenation of error-correcting codes into a single reflective set. Biological systems, being autopoietic in physical space, control quantum measurements in the physical universe. The biological evolution is really a functional evolution of measurement constraints in which limits of iteration are established possessing criteria of perfection and having selective values.
Highlights
Quantum measurement process percolates micro and macroscales
As a result of quantum measurement, a new actualized macrostate appears non-locally evolving from the previous macrostate, since its points are not defined before the quantum measurement
Local assembly takes place when the field to which reflection is realized is already defined in the actual three-dimensional space, i.e., when a device is external to the assembling system
Summary
Quantum measurement process percolates micro and macroscales. In quantum measurements, all interactions are mediated by a holistic reflective factor (an observer) measuring the interaction. Resolution of the paradox perpetually proceeds along time, through the flow of which micro and macro levels are connected and any solution is relative This type of model can be illustrated as an iterative algorithm, using a dynamically changing contraction mapping as the interface of a state and a transition rule [2]. It describes a nonlocal structural unfolding where contradictory consequent realizations (quantum reductions) are separated within the internal time-space. It generates an iterative process of reflection to this uncertainty via allotting it by a certain value It corresponds to a non-local assembly, which is realized as a reduction of the uncertainty in quantum measurement. Quantum complementarity arises as a set of these different projections that cannot exist simultaneously, where contradictory states generate the appearance of uncertainties in the coordinate/impulse or energy/time observables
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
