Abstract

Human population growth and sea-level rise are increasing the demand for protection of coastal property against shoreline erosion. Living shorelines are designed to provide shoreline protection and are constructed or reinforced using natural elements. While living shorelines are gaining popularity with homeowners, their ability to provide ecological services (e.g., habitat provision and trophic transfer) is not well understood, and information is needed to improve coastal and resource management decision-making. We examined benthic community responses to living shorelines in two case-study subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay using a before-after control-impact study design. At Windy Hill, a bulkhead was removed and replaced by three tombolos, sand fill, and native marsh vegetation. At Lynnhaven, 25 m of eroding marsh shoreline was stabilized with coir logs, sand fill, and native marsh vegetation. Communities of large (> 3 mm) infauna adjacent to living shorelines at both locations tended to increase in biomass by the end of the study period. Community compositions changed significantly following living shoreline construction at Windy Hill, reflecting a trend toward higher density and biomass of large bivalves at living shorelines compared to pre-construction. Increasing trends in density and biomass of clams and simultaneously decreasing density and decreasing trends in biomass of polychaetes suggest a transition toward stable infaunal communities at living shorelines over time, though longer-term studies are warranted.

Highlights

  • Human population growth has led to shoreline development aimed at protecting against erosion and sea-level rise

  • Biomass tended to increase in response to living shorelines

  • Species composition of clam assemblages changed at Windy Hill, which likely drove the biomass trends

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human population growth has led to shoreline development aimed at protecting against erosion and sea-level rise. Hard structures may lead to loss of intertidal habitats and reduce the esthetic value of the shoreline (Dugan et al 2008; Walker et al 2011); the demand is increasing for alternative methods of erosion protection with natural elements (Arkema et al 2013; Cheong et al 2013; Narayan et al 2016). To inform coastal and resource management decisions, more information is needed on the effects of alternative erosion-protection structures such as Bliving shorelines^ (shorelines incorporating natural elements) on living resources and their ecosystem functions (Sutton-Grier et al 2015; The White House 2015; Narayan et al 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call