Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explored factors related to the use of alternative financial services (i.e., payday loans, prepaid debit cards, pawn shops, auto title lenders, and rent-to-own stores) among a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (N1 = 27,564), and a sub-sample of people with disabilities (PWDs) (N2 = 1,232). Using secondary data from the Financial Industry Regulation Authority’s 2015 National Financial Capabilities Study (NFCS), two separate logistic regression models revealed several significant individual and institutional level factors that predicted alternative financial service use among both samples. The full-sample model was found to be significant, χ2(10) = 3,917.22, p < .001, as was the sub-sample model, χ2(10) = 193.43, p < .001. Additionally, it was found that PWDs were twice as likely to use alterative financial services than people without disabilities. Further research is recommended to empirically explore the consequences of alternative financial service use among PWDs. Implications of this study are targeted toward social work researchers, policy makers, and human service practitioners.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.