Abstract

British and Irish Mesolithic studies have long been characterized by a reliance on broad-scale lithic typologies, both to provide chronologies, and in discussion of ‘cultural’ groups. More recently, traditional narrative structures—period definitions of ‘Early’ and ‘Late’, or culture typologies—have been complemented by a host of other evidence. This has included new studies of site stratigraphy, evidence for seasonality, and material culture chaîne opératoire chronologies, which place a greater emphasis on both temporal precision and the lived experiences of Mesolithic peoples. This paper will consider how the study of organic artefacts forces these narrative scales into acute focus, and presents an opportunity to explore the challenges in synthesizing different forms of data. We discuss how the evidence from sites in Ireland and Britain allows for new approaches, and highlight some of the challenges that this evidence presents, not least the perennial issue of moving from site-specific data to broader narratives. While the nature of earlier prehistoric evidence makes this an especially obvious issue for Mesolithic studies, it is one which generally besets archaeology. We suggest that in order to move beyond this in earlier prehistoric studies specifically, we need to make better use of all evidence sources, however seemingly prosaic, including antiquarian collections in museums, and chance and casual finds. Only by including the raft of available data, and recognizing its utility beyond the sum of individual apparently uninspiring parts, can we begin to move from generalizing narratives to more nuanced archaeological understandings of past material worlds.

Highlights

  • Mesolithic studies are marked out from other lines of archaeological enquiry by the antiquity of the evidence, and the relative imprecision of our chronologies

  • This paper will consider how the study of organic artefacts forces these narrative scales into acute focus, and presents an opportunity to explore the challenges in synthesizing different forms of data

  • We consider the ways in which chronologies derived from these organic artefacts influence our conceptualization of the period as a whole, and the issues raised when tacking between the specific evidence sets from individual sites and wider regional and temporal datasets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mesolithic studies are marked out from other lines of archaeological enquiry by the antiquity of the evidence, and the relative imprecision of our chronologies. This imprecision is in contrast with the precision of microscale chronologies at individual sites, raising issues of wider relevance for early prehistory more generally. This paper will examine organic material culture from a series of Irish and British Mesolithic sites in order to explore our understanding of this period. We consider the ways in which chronologies derived from these organic artefacts influence our conceptualization of the period as a whole, and the issues raised when tacking between the specific evidence sets from individual sites and wider regional and temporal datasets

Timing the Mesolithic of Britain and Ireland
Time and Organic Artefacts
Cutts Cutts Loughan Island Ballyholme Cutts Cutts Cutts Cutts Cutts Shroove
Case Studies
Probability density
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call