Abstract

BackgroundThe indications for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continue to evolve. The aim of this study was to report outcomes in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCC outside traditional criteria including macrovascular invasion (MVI).MethodsWe reviewed outcomes in patients who met the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (n = 159) and our center-specific criteria (UCSF+) (largest tumor diameter ≤ 10 cm, any tumor number, AFP ≤ 1000 ng/ml) (n = 58). We also assessed outcomes in patients with MVI (n = 27).ResultsThe median follow was 28 (10.6–42.7) months. The 5 year overall survival and risk of recurrence (RR) in the UCSF and UCSF + group was 71% vs 69% (P = 0.7) and 13% vs 36% (P = 0.1) respectively. When patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml were excluded from the UCSF + group, RR was 27% (P = 0.3). Among patients with MVI who had downstaging (DS), 4/5(80%) in low-risk group (good response and AFP ≤ 100 ng/ml) and 2/10 (20%) in the high-risk group (poor response or AFP > 100 ng/ml) were alive at the last follow-up. When DS was not feasible, 3/3 (100%) in the low-risk group (AFP ≤ 100 ng/ml + Vp1-2 MVI) and 1/9 (9.1%) in the high-risk group (AFP > 100 or Vp3 MVI) were alive. The 5 year OS in the low-risk MVI group was 85% (P = 0.003).ConclusionWith inclusion of AFP, response to downstaging and degree of MVI, acceptable survival can be achieved with LDLT for HCC outside traditional criteria.

Highlights

  • Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Costentin et al 2019)

  • We developed our own center-specific selection criteria for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with HCC

  • The objective of this study was to share our experience with LDLT for HCC using expanded transplant criteria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Costentin et al 2019). LDLT centers have expanded the cutoffs on tumor size and number to increase transplant eligible patients (Hong et al 2016; Lee et al 2016, 2008). The National Cancer Center Korea (NCCK) criteria used PET scan to select patients with HCC ≤ 10 cm irrespective of tumor number (Lee et al 2016). Factors such as low sensitivity, cost effectiveness, and variable SUV cutoffs limit wide spread utility of PET scans for selecting HCC patients for transplantation (Lu et al 2019). The aim of this study was to report outcomes in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCC outside traditional criteria including macrovascular invasion (MVI). Conclusion With inclusion of AFP, response to downstaging and degree of MVI, acceptable survival can be achieved with LDLT for HCC outside traditional criteria

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.