Abstract
Objective:To examine outcomes of living-donor intestinal transplant (LDITx) recipients.Background:LDITx is not routinely performed because of surgical risks to the donor and the potential inferior physiologic performance of the segmental graft. However, data on the effectiveness of LDITx are scarce.Design:This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing LDITx between May 1999 and December 2021 in intestinal transplant programs in 2 university-affiliated hospitals in China.Results:Actuarial survival rates were 80%, 72.7%, 66.7% for patient and 72.4%, 63.6%, 60% for graft at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Recipients with >3/6 HLA-matched grafts had superior patient and graft survival rates than those with ≤3/6 HLA-matched grafts (P<0.05). There were 12 deaths among the recipients, with infection being the leading cause (41.7%), followed by rejection (33.3%), surgical complications (16.7%), and others (8.3%). There were 16 graft losses among the recipients, with acute cellular rejection being the predominant cause (37.5%), followed by infection (25%), technical failure (12.5%), chronic rejection (12.5%), and others (12.5%). With an average follow-up of 3.7 (range, 0.6–23) years, the rates of acute and chronic rejection were 35% and 5%, and the rate of cytomegalovirus disease and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were 5% and 2.5%, respectively. Of the 40 patients, 28 (70%) are currently alive and have achieved enteral autonomy.Conclusions:LDITx is a valuable treatment option for patients with end-stage intestinal failure. Improved immunosuppression, better HLA matching, and shorter cold ischemia times were associated with reduced rates of rejection, viral-mediated infection and improved graft survival.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.