Abstract
Abstract Field boundaries can provide ecosystem services to crops by creating better abiotic conditions for crop growth, and can also act as habitat for beneficial arthropods. This suggests that crop boundaries may create an intermediate hump-shaped increase in crop yield, where negative edge effects are cancelled out by increased ecosystem services from the field boundary. However, there is little large-scale evidence showing this, largely because plot-scale crop yields are costly and time-consuming to measure. Precision yield data from combine yield monitors has huge potential in this respect, as the equipment is widespread and data is frequently recorded by growers. In this study, we used 252 field-years of yield monitor data from three common crops - wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), or peas ( Pisum sativum ) - recorded across Alberta, Canada, and examined how yield varied with distances from common crop boundary types. Average crop yield tended to increase with distance from crop boundaries before plateauing at about 50 m, and yield variation (SD) tended to decrease with distance. There was evidence of an intermediate increase in yield for wheat away from shelterbelts, and a weak increase in canola, but this was not seen for other crop types or boundary types. This study represents one of the first uses of precision yield data to measure ecosystem service provision at large spatial scales.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.